Top Of Mind

Entertainment. Advertising. Technology

  • Categories

Archive for the 'Advertising' Category

Do we really need skinny models in our advertising?

Posted by Thura on 16th June 2007

There is a long running argument in the advertising industry. Does advertising reflect the values of the society that it is in or is society trying to mimic advertising?

One point of view is that advertising portrays an ideal place of what we want our society to be. It’s all about fulfilling aspirations and dreams. Yes, our brands will make your dreams come true.

But there is a problem. We live in an imperfect world. Things happen, they go wrong – and the solution is never the quick fix that most advertising seems to promise. Specifically the portrayal of women in advertising has increasingly come under scrutiny and attack by groups who feel that the women are not accurately portrayed – especially when it comes to body size.

Unilever is one of the few companies that seem to be addressing the issue in it’s advertising.

First came the Campaign For Real Beauty for the Dove Brand. Instead of using slim and svelte models to promote the brand they used “real,” women of different body shapes and skin color. It has received wide coverage and praise from women’s groups. While other’s have complained that it is a cynical attempt to sell even more stuff, whatever the motivation, at least they are doing something about it.

Going a step further, the Anglo-Dutch company based in Amsterdam has recently issued further guidelines here to it’s marketers and advertising agencies. While not strict, it “expects,” that the models be between BMI (Body Mass Index) of 18.5 and 25. Anything below 17.5 is suspected to signal anorexia nervosa.

So now that someone is doing something about it, will others follow or continue to do what they have always done?

Or ultimately is it too big an issue for a single company or even and industry to overcome? Or, are we, as a society been brain-washed to expect the slim and svelte models in our advertising?

Posted in Business, Advertising | No Comments »

Advertising Reviewed : When Ads Work..

Posted by Thura on 18th April 2007

I feel something warm.I just hope the bad guys don't have shrapnel grenades!!Redefining chemical burns.

After my somewhat negative review of D&G ads earlier, I thought I should also show some good examples.

Here are some refreshing ads that do work, yet still have naked guys and suggestions of violence in it. While seeing a naked guy might not be your thing, you take a look at the ad and you get the message immediately.

People do know what happens when they don’t use condoms, but these ads bring the point home by putting this guy in situations where most men would feel vulnerable. Besides, I can almost imagine the guy wincing as he faces these situations. Made me wince.

Pure genius.. having said that I am happy not to have been involved when they made the casting calls!!

In case it is too small (ahem) to read, the ad copy reads “Don’t be stupid. Protect yourself.” and goes to give the product name. Click on the image to see it in all it’s glory.

Posted in Cool, Advertising | No Comments »

Advertising Reviewed : The Gang Bang (?) on D&G Print Ad

Posted by Thura on 22nd February 2007

What is it meant to be?Ads are not meant to be over analyzed, they are to be felt. Any ad that doesn’t evoke an emotion - hate, love, desire - from you is not doing it’s job. And they are meant to give you a message. Well, at least good ads are meant to.

But what happens when you run across an ad like the recent ad from D&G in Esquire Magazine. D&G ads have been bugging me for awhile - it is form over function, style without substance. The ad depicts.. OK you can see it so I won’t describe it. But what the hell is going on in the picture? What is supposed to be happening there?

Is it meant to be provocative?

Is this meant to be creative?

Yeah, it’s edgy, suppose to be cool and high-fashion, but what else does it want to say? As a fashion brand it needs to be exclusive, but this style over substance message has just got to stop. I am sorry, but there is no creativity there - perhaps just a desire to be “different,”at any cost.

Oviously there are enough people in the world buying into this thing to keep D&G in the creme, but if a brand is meant to represent who we are, do the D&G users want to be associated with this type of “promotion.” Yes, this ad evoked a strong emotion from me (so in a way it is doing it’s job), but I can tell you that it is not the one they want. However since I have never bought D&G and never plan to, they will not give a hoot either.

In fact the National Organization of Woman saying that they are disturbed by the ads. While I do not believe in being PC for PC sake, I have to agree that the ad crosses certain lines.

Ultimately this is what a lazy Ad Exec (or Creative Director) would do if they are creatively bankrupt and want attention at any cost.

Thanks to the original article from Brand Week

Posted in Advertising | No Comments »

YOU are the Advertising Agency of the year - or is Ad Age beating a dead horse?

Posted by Thura on 16th February 2007

YOU are the Ad agency of the year!!

YOU may not know it, YOU may not want it and YOU may not even give a hoot about it, but YOU have been named Agency of the Year by AdAge magazine (an Advertising Industry trade magazine) in it’s annual awards issue back in December. And there is nothing, nothing YOU can do about it.

In the ending days of 2006, we have seen and commented on how TIME Magazine’s person of the year went to “YOU.” And what do YOU know, that made us all feel special and loved. Awww..

Obviously TIME Magazine had it’s reasons (cough cough), but at least they were original about it. No one has ever nominated “YOU,” the unwashed masses (as AdAge quaintly puts it) of the internet as the person of the year or one of importance. So when a publication as respected as AdAge comes along and also nominates “YOU,” as Agency of the year, then YOU know that YOU truly must be special and even blessed.

This has been bugging me since December, but only now can I get down to writing it. But first allow me to pause here a bit and offer a belated congratulations to AdAge for it’s originality of thought.

So what did you unknowingly do to deserve this accolade? Two words, or is it one? YouTube. Specifically Videos like the Diet Coke-Mentos.

While I was one of the million of people who did view the video, and thought that what an ingenious thing to do, at the end of it, was neither persuaded to drink Diet Coke nor pop a few Mentos. This spewed, excuse me, a slew of copy-cat “experiment videos,” of varying degrees of taste which did attract a lot of views. Never-the-less, that does not make YOU Ad Agency of the year.

The article that talks about why they nominated “YOU,” as the agency of the year, here. They must have had a head start on the eggnog way ahead of anyone else. That is the only reasonable explanation that I can think of for AdAge to come up with “YOU,” as the Agency of the year.

Actually, I can think of another reason though. Namely it’s their attempt to resurrect the “Death of the Advertising Agency,” mantra that they have been chanting for the last couple of years.

Well, AdAge is right. The Ad Agency is indeed dying, terminal, checking out, in ICU – but not quite yet. That is why a lot of traditional ad agencies are moving their eggs into other baskets – activations, consumer relations, public relations. You name it, the agencies are moving there.

Most agency net-works are in the process of transforming themselves from Advertising Agencies to Marketing Communications Companies – or whatever they want to call themselves, but they are diversifying into other areas.

But as long as the cost per rating point is most efficient on Television (as opposed to other mediums), there will still be need for the traditional Ad Agency, which can do a spanking storyboard and a catchy tagline. It won’t last of course, but it’s gonna be around for a while yet, so hold off the – “EVERYBODY PANIC, Ad Agencies are dying/dead” cry for now.

Posted in Advertising | No Comments »